Attorney-General withdraws criminal defamation suit against Kogi Central lawmaker, ending a case that sparked national debate.
Nigeria’s Federal Government has formally withdrawn criminal charges against Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, bringing an abrupt end to a high-profile legal battle that attracted widespread public attention.
An Abuja High Court on Thursday struck out the case after the Office of the Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF) filed a Notice of Discontinuance, effectively terminating the prosecution against the Kogi Central senator.
Court documents show that the charges — which included criminal defamation and related offences — stemmed from comments Akpoti-Uduaghan allegedly made during a televised interview. The suit, referenced as FHC/ABJ/CR/195/2025, was officially discontinued through a notice dated 12 December 2025.
Presiding judge, Justice C. N. Oji, acknowledged the withdrawal and ordered the case struck out, describing the move as a reminder of the need for caution in the exercise of prosecutorial powers.
“The court hopes this decision will encourage restraint, promote healing and reinforce respect for the rule of law within our democratic system,” the judge said.
In open court, counsel representing the Federal Government confirmed the decision to discontinue the matter.
“On behalf of the Honourable Attorney-General of the Federation, a notice of discontinuance has been filed in line with the Administration of Criminal Justice Act,” the prosecution told the court. “This step was taken in the overall interest of justice and public confidence in the legal process.”
Senator hails decision as vindication
Following the ruling, Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan welcomed the outcome, describing it as a personal and democratic victory.
“Today’s decision reinforces my faith in the rule of law,” she said. “I remain committed to serving my constituents and standing up for the democratic rights of Nigerians.”
She also expressed gratitude to her legal team and supporters, who had stood by her throughout the legal proceedings.
The now-dismissed case had generated intense debate across the country, with civil society groups and legal commentators raising concerns about freedom of expression and the use of criminal defamation laws against political figures.
With the charges formally struck out, the chapter closes on a legal confrontation that tested the balance between state authority, free speech and prosecutorial discretion in Nigeria’s democracy.
