Uche Maduagwu has stirred controversy once again, this time accusing May Yul Edochie of silently enabling the wave of online insults directed at her estranged husband, actor Yul Edochie. In a blunt Instagram post on Thursday, the outspoken Nollywood figure challenged May to publicly caution her followers, stating that her silence suggests tacit approval of the insults.
Maduagwu argued that since May remains legally married to Yul, she carries a moral responsibility to protect the family name, even in separation. He questioned the logic behind fans consistently mocking Yul while still glorifying May as a “queen,” warning that such behavior disrespects the sanctity of marriage and fuels toxic narratives online.
The actor did not mince words, stating, “You’re still his wife legally. Yet your fans abuse him daily, and you say nothing. Is that what Christianity teaches? If you truly respect your marriage and your faith, speak out now and ask them to stop.” His comments have ignited heated debates, especially as they come just days after Rita Edochie’s strong defense of May keeping the Edochie name.
Critics of Uche’s statement say he is once again inserting himself into a family matter for clout, while supporters believe he’s raising a valid point about cyberbullying and public perception. Maduagwu went further to claim that May’s continuous use of the “Edochie” surname might be aiding her brand and endorsements, indirectly benefiting from the same family name under attack.
He issued a direct challenge: “If you won’t speak up, drop the name. Let’s see if the support and endorsements remain. Prove you’re truly dignified and not benefiting from a name you won’t defend.”
Yul Edochie himself has not responded to Maduagwu’s comments, but observers expect further drama as tensions between online fan bases and public figures continue to escalate around the Edochie saga.
The situation has once again spotlighted the blurry line between private marital conflict and public accountability in the age of social media where celebrities’ personal choices are fodder for national debate.
